Posted On: 03/15/2015 11:18:58 AM
Post# of 39368
I've been sparring with David, TD, ColoradoGold reently on the other board. This dude is getting more pathetic than he had been in the past. Seriously he says one thing and contradicts what he says 5 minutes later. Proving he's a freaking liar. I posted lately statistics on court cases and the outcome. I for a change wrote an intellegent post on the board that will most likely be deleted, but are the facts. 99 % of my posts on HUB are just to screw with them. I thought I'd share it with you guys.
For the record TD / Colorado or whoever the F&%$ he is today. Without his 3 year old links of THE GOB denying the oil find 3 years ago. He ain't nothing but a lying P O S ..... Here it is ....................
It has been posted that the mountain of evidence against Treaty is overwhelimg. Yet there has been no mention of where the evidence came from of Treaty committing these hidious crimes against the shareholders, investing community and society alike.
1)In serious cases The FBI or The SEC raids the office of suspected wrongdoers and takes everything to examine. Treaty has never mentioned this in a PR nor was an 8K filed that their offices were raided. Had it been, shareholders would have heard of it somewhere " wink wink ". There would have been photos posted of this action. Which IMO means the only evidence The SEC has was provided by external sources " wink wink ". Even in the claim The SEC wrote " it is believed Treaty did these things ". Now it's up to a court to decide. Quite possibly most of the evidence The SEC has was already used in another case that failed to convince the judge of such wrog doings.
Moving right along
2) In a recent post it was said Treaty has already been found guilty of these crimes. In another post shortly after it was posted that a court date has not been set yet. In reality Treaty has been found guilty in public forums. Not a court of law. If the evidence against Treaty is so overwhelming IMO the case is a slam dunk and The SEC would have expedited a court hearing. For a comany that has been under investigation for 3 plus years and The SEC is not yet prepared to ask for a court date laso raises red flags. Treaty, who it is said is bilking the investment community out of millions of dollars and is not shut down and allowed to continue daily operations. Well IMO is ludicrous.
The fact that Treaty was offered a deal by The SEC ( Per The SEC ) means The SEC just wants it over to move on. The fact that they declined to accept to deal means that most likely the law of averages will prevail in this case as well. 97 % of cases are settled or dismissed before going to court.
The FAKE BK. The evidence against Treaty was overwhelming in this case as well. Andrew Reid testified under oath of the Belize deal. The judge must have agreed that his testimony was true and accurate. Beyond a reasonable doubt. The case was so weak not all of the witnesses testified on the stand. IMO it was to not perjure themselves.
Case scenario ! DISMISSED. It has been posted that it was dismissed by the judge who stated it should have been filed in the county / parish court. Yet an appeal was filed by the plaintiffs, and accepted by the clerk IN A CASE THAT WAS DISMISSED BECAUSE IT NEVER SHOULD HAVE BEEN IN A FED COURT. Should the case not have been dismissed without prejudice had that been the case ? Allowing it tio be refiled in the proper court ?
Just more tortuous interference Bullshit
I like our chances ... I've got my reasons
For the record TD / Colorado or whoever the F&%$ he is today. Without his 3 year old links of THE GOB denying the oil find 3 years ago. He ain't nothing but a lying P O S ..... Here it is ....................
It has been posted that the mountain of evidence against Treaty is overwhelimg. Yet there has been no mention of where the evidence came from of Treaty committing these hidious crimes against the shareholders, investing community and society alike.
1)In serious cases The FBI or The SEC raids the office of suspected wrongdoers and takes everything to examine. Treaty has never mentioned this in a PR nor was an 8K filed that their offices were raided. Had it been, shareholders would have heard of it somewhere " wink wink ". There would have been photos posted of this action. Which IMO means the only evidence The SEC has was provided by external sources " wink wink ". Even in the claim The SEC wrote " it is believed Treaty did these things ". Now it's up to a court to decide. Quite possibly most of the evidence The SEC has was already used in another case that failed to convince the judge of such wrog doings.
Moving right along
2) In a recent post it was said Treaty has already been found guilty of these crimes. In another post shortly after it was posted that a court date has not been set yet. In reality Treaty has been found guilty in public forums. Not a court of law. If the evidence against Treaty is so overwhelming IMO the case is a slam dunk and The SEC would have expedited a court hearing. For a comany that has been under investigation for 3 plus years and The SEC is not yet prepared to ask for a court date laso raises red flags. Treaty, who it is said is bilking the investment community out of millions of dollars and is not shut down and allowed to continue daily operations. Well IMO is ludicrous.
The fact that Treaty was offered a deal by The SEC ( Per The SEC ) means The SEC just wants it over to move on. The fact that they declined to accept to deal means that most likely the law of averages will prevail in this case as well. 97 % of cases are settled or dismissed before going to court.
The FAKE BK. The evidence against Treaty was overwhelming in this case as well. Andrew Reid testified under oath of the Belize deal. The judge must have agreed that his testimony was true and accurate. Beyond a reasonable doubt. The case was so weak not all of the witnesses testified on the stand. IMO it was to not perjure themselves.
Case scenario ! DISMISSED. It has been posted that it was dismissed by the judge who stated it should have been filed in the county / parish court. Yet an appeal was filed by the plaintiffs, and accepted by the clerk IN A CASE THAT WAS DISMISSED BECAUSE IT NEVER SHOULD HAVE BEEN IN A FED COURT. Should the case not have been dismissed without prejudice had that been the case ? Allowing it tio be refiled in the proper court ?
Just more tortuous interference Bullshit
I like our chances ... I've got my reasons
(0)
(0)
I expose those connected to Hedge Funds and Illegal NSS to help protect penny stocks from their vicious attacks trying to BK the company for the benefit of HEDGE FUNDS. I've received NO compensation in any form for such, except for a few thank yous...
Scroll down for more posts ▼
