Posted On: 01/20/2015 10:20:03 PM
Post# of 4205
I agree with you doing it by earnings and not revenue.
After all, PE ratio means Price to Earnings, not Price to Revenue.
I'm not sure where your 15 million revenue came from unless you're using nteks forecast for 2014; but we now know they only reported just over 1 million for Q ended March and just over 2 million for Q ended June. And I don't know the significance of the 5 multiple, but overall i would say if pps was being manipulated, ntek could correct it, either by issuing the rest of the movies promised and audits promised, or they are deliberately issuing promises (continuing) and not keeping those promises thereby manipulating pps for their own reasons.
Like i said, when they either quit breaking promises, or quit issuing them to break, pps should at least stabilize.
I'm not sure if i completely understand your question, but i think ntek has a chance to hit a homerun if they keep the promises mentioned above.
After all, PE ratio means Price to Earnings, not Price to Revenue.
I'm not sure where your 15 million revenue came from unless you're using nteks forecast for 2014; but we now know they only reported just over 1 million for Q ended March and just over 2 million for Q ended June. And I don't know the significance of the 5 multiple, but overall i would say if pps was being manipulated, ntek could correct it, either by issuing the rest of the movies promised and audits promised, or they are deliberately issuing promises (continuing) and not keeping those promises thereby manipulating pps for their own reasons.
Like i said, when they either quit breaking promises, or quit issuing them to break, pps should at least stabilize.
I'm not sure if i completely understand your question, but i think ntek has a chance to hit a homerun if they keep the promises mentioned above.
(0)
(0)
