Posted On: 01/13/2015 7:47:18 PM
Post# of 8059
Re: mediscience #7349
http://www.stai.org/pdfs/dtc-whitepaperreseri...rocess.pdf
dtc sept 2013 whitepaper providing for due process-hope Brad is following through on that process w dtc approved lawyers-
CWRN did not issue any restricted stock into the market as per our dd and the penalty by dtc- which has a mindset that all co's are guilty- against all innocent 3rd party purchasers 4 years after the fact of maybe $8400 worth of stock mistakenly admitted by Oppenheimer broker in Boca Raton Florida,where the company which previously inhabited CWRN's legal structure was based-and thus that huge incidence may mean the stock was presented to Oppenheimer by principals of that previous entity- far outweighs the error even if there were an issuance of restricted stock before its time
stock not held by dtc via its nominee cede and co is still tradeable- i.e., physical stock certificates privately held-apparently manually matched w buyers by brokers
dtc sept 2013 whitepaper providing for due process-hope Brad is following through on that process w dtc approved lawyers-
CWRN did not issue any restricted stock into the market as per our dd and the penalty by dtc- which has a mindset that all co's are guilty- against all innocent 3rd party purchasers 4 years after the fact of maybe $8400 worth of stock mistakenly admitted by Oppenheimer broker in Boca Raton Florida,where the company which previously inhabited CWRN's legal structure was based-and thus that huge incidence may mean the stock was presented to Oppenheimer by principals of that previous entity- far outweighs the error even if there were an issuance of restricted stock before its time
stock not held by dtc via its nominee cede and co is still tradeable- i.e., physical stock certificates privately held-apparently manually matched w buyers by brokers
(0)
(0)Scroll down for more posts ▼
