Posted On: 01/04/2015 11:42:54 PM
Post# of 4205
I just saw a pp post that i sorta agree with.
Sadly he misses the mark.
We agree there's money to be made shorting a stock like ntek. But we disagree on who's been shorting it.
We all know at the 2013&2014 shm's they placed a high priority on audits. We all know they said np1 in 2013 even though they knew full well the prototype wasn't finished or tested.
Yet the poster thinks ntek didn't pump the pps doing those things, and they don't think lying was done.
Astonishing. But we're all used to the board of pixie dust, powder puffs, unicorns, fairytales, and lucky charms.
And I'm sure you intended Al Stone's hollow deceptive words but auto correct screwed it up.
Sadly he misses the mark.
We agree there's money to be made shorting a stock like ntek. But we disagree on who's been shorting it.
We all know at the 2013&2014 shm's they placed a high priority on audits. We all know they said np1 in 2013 even though they knew full well the prototype wasn't finished or tested.
Yet the poster thinks ntek didn't pump the pps doing those things, and they don't think lying was done.
Astonishing. But we're all used to the board of pixie dust, powder puffs, unicorns, fairytales, and lucky charms.
And I'm sure you intended Al Stone's hollow deceptive words but auto correct screwed it up.
(0)
(0)
