Why would you take an otherwise legal product which is still controversial and show publically how to jeopardize GRCU'S product and compromise their reputation by showing how to make the product illegal in most states??? What's the reasoning or incentive? Don't you think an agent investigating the use of these products and how they can be manipulated would take a YouTube video and use it against GRCU! I'm confident Calkin knows the CBD/THC ratios and how to perfect variations of their products without public commentary and the risk associated by others doing it for him.