Well that need not mean throwing good money after bad absent something different than what we've been fed the past several years. I'm not trying to bash Chris, and I understand he's been dealt a bad hand, but these aren't new issues/concerns.

So now, please tell me what we have in verifiable hard assets that we might invest in besides the projects recently outlined. Do we have anything in writing that specifies their scope, deliverables, cost/benefit, ROI, etc? They are vague and high level. All this support stuff is admirable, but where's the beef? Who is going to front run that need?