Warp, first, thanks for the civil, reasonable discussion. It was base on sens and spec. All of them had ethical issues telling 10% of patient, ie false positives, that they had Alzheimer's. Guess that would be acceptable in veterinary medicine. Again, I was stunned that they were not as excited about lympro as I was. Shame I didn't listen. We were at .17. I did not talk to them about RUO as we were not being told that at the time or I missed it.