Posted On: 12/09/2014 11:28:38 AM
Post# of 30066
Re: SouthBreeze #12596
Been waiting to see how long it would take you.
You are mistaken about what I insult. Truth is, I insult the mind boggling pumping without a reality check.
So let me ask you MR. SB, how are my comments insulting when my responses are met with the same views, statements and sentiment when I have been critical of the CEO. Not the company, the other scientist or program leaders in the company. So tell me, why are those not equally as insulting.
Fact remains, I remain critical of GC, long and supportive of AMBS and have complete disdain for those on this board that ORIGINALLY attacked my criticism of GC's leadership jumping to the false conclusions and labeling me a soft basher. I have observed bashing, continous pumping, racism, threats and language that would make a sailor blush.
So tell me why one is insulting and the other isn't.
I remain true and long to Ambs. I have less than positive thoughts on GC's ability to lead and deliver on his promises. IM betting we succeed in spite of him.
You are mistaken about what I insult. Truth is, I insult the mind boggling pumping without a reality check.
So let me ask you MR. SB, how are my comments insulting when my responses are met with the same views, statements and sentiment when I have been critical of the CEO. Not the company, the other scientist or program leaders in the company. So tell me, why are those not equally as insulting.
Fact remains, I remain critical of GC, long and supportive of AMBS and have complete disdain for those on this board that ORIGINALLY attacked my criticism of GC's leadership jumping to the false conclusions and labeling me a soft basher. I have observed bashing, continous pumping, racism, threats and language that would make a sailor blush.
So tell me why one is insulting and the other isn't.
I remain true and long to Ambs. I have less than positive thoughts on GC's ability to lead and deliver on his promises. IM betting we succeed in spite of him.
(0)
(0)
