Posted On: 12/03/2014 9:04:13 AM
Post# of 43065
I see that someone else had great difficulty understanding my post from yesterday ( to you) that had the simple exclusion of the superfluous word' sale'.
Any thoughts about the company and it's operations with the new superfluous inclusion ?
So, do you feel that since Richard Heddle only mentioned licensing/sale of processors in the most recent 8K, and never mentions the *magic catalyst* at all:
1. The *magic catalyst was always a complete fabrication
2. The * magic catalyst* can not be licensed because it is not patented.
3. The *magic catalyst* was really just a prop to pump stock as promoters and insiders dumped shares to the extremely gullible and simple at around the $.90+/- mark ?
Any thoughts about the company and it's operations with the new superfluous inclusion ?
So, do you feel that since Richard Heddle only mentioned licensing/sale of processors in the most recent 8K, and never mentions the *magic catalyst* at all:
1. The *magic catalyst was always a complete fabrication
2. The * magic catalyst* can not be licensed because it is not patented.
3. The *magic catalyst* was really just a prop to pump stock as promoters and insiders dumped shares to the extremely gullible and simple at around the $.90+/- mark ?
(0)
(0)Scroll down for more posts ▼
