I see that someone else had great difficulty understanding my post from yesterday ( to you) that had the simple exclusion of the superfluous word' sale'.

Any thoughts about the company and it's operations with the new superfluous inclusion ?

So, do you feel that since Richard Heddle only mentioned licensing/sale of processors in the most recent 8K, and never mentions the *magic catalyst* at all:

1. The *magic catalyst was always a complete fabrication

2. The * magic catalyst* can not be licensed because it is not patented.

3. The *magic catalyst* was really just a prop to pump stock as promoters and insiders dumped shares to the extremely gullible and simple at around the $.90+/- mark ?