Posted On: 12/02/2014 4:54:57 PM
Post# of 43066
I am glad you bring up *manipulation*.
Do you feel the recent exclusion of the 'magic catalyst' in Richard Heddles letter, and the statement of only looking for licensing on processors means either,
1. The 'magic catalyst' is not needed and has never been ?
2. The 'magic catalyst' is not needed only in the 'flagship' so potential buyers do not need it ?
3. The 'magic catalyst' was always a complete fabrication and only used as a form of manipulation to sell shares at much higher prices as insiders and promoters dumped ?
Do you feel the recent exclusion of the 'magic catalyst' in Richard Heddles letter, and the statement of only looking for licensing on processors means either,
1. The 'magic catalyst' is not needed and has never been ?
2. The 'magic catalyst' is not needed only in the 'flagship' so potential buyers do not need it ?
3. The 'magic catalyst' was always a complete fabrication and only used as a form of manipulation to sell shares at much higher prices as insiders and promoters dumped ?
(0)
(0)
