Since I am new to message boards I suppose I am not clear on how to present ideas of an explanatory nature since I am used to how it is done in the real world.

I have offered 3 detailed explanations to your query based on facts provided by Richard Heddle, the company and it's filings.

You have offered 3 questions in reply containing no detail ,or explanation of the cryptic reply at all, and that is a viewpoint ?

I guess I will just stick with the facts as I have described in great detail and how it is done in the real world.

Note to self: In the future I would prefer to real world forms of communication dealing with the company and it's operations and not questions posed as answers because I am not used to how a message board considers that an answer somehow.