Posted On: 12/01/2014 12:41:01 PM
Post# of 43066
for those who've asked what exactly my use of *line in the sand* refers to:
the way it works ..
entity enters an OTC stock .. with 2 crews (most are interchangeable)
one side works what i call the PRO side .. the other side works the CON side
entity front loads then runs OTC stock utilizing PRO side
entity then undertakes the *short* in the OTC stock (CON side)
depending on various aspects (SS legitimacy et al) there may be more than 1 RUN
b4 the final *KILL* for profit order is executed
the problem entity encountered with P2O ran across multiple levels
not the least of which was an *initial* inability to access P2O certs in 2010
that inability set up 4+ years of *efforts* to force out legit sellers of significance
2 years ago .. *entities* line in the sand was 1.50 to 1.65 which i noted *there*
one can observe the rather curious reality of dolt's settlement and the RUN
on PTOI to 1.49
after of course an aromatic sold *mere* days b4 said settlement @ approx 77c
suspect this *aromatic* and others (of the colluding variety) were responsible
for threshold being triggered on PTOI for the second time (June 2012 .. 10 days)
realize within mere days of dolt's settlement RUN .. resetting via compression
of PTOI was back in play (as it had been with that one exception since mid 2012)
fingers point to *collusion* specific to who *entered* P2O in 2012
so if in 2012 and 2013 .. entities' line in the sand was 1.50 to 1.65
what did it become after 18 to 19 months of non stop compression via resets?
my thinking in mid Sept 2014 .. was 35 to 55c (approx) .. it's why in mgmt's shoes
and recognizing *entity* was on their knees .. i would have 8k'd the national co.
by the EO the 3rd Q (9.30.14) >> UPDATE
i would never have allowed this FILTH to *rebreak* 10c on PTOI
since then (2+ months ago) and clearly since *volume* undertaken on 10.9 and 10.10.14
that rivals 1.4.12 and 1.5.12 .. in volume only
it's become quite clear that the *new* short (ie line in their sand) is far lower
than 35 to 55c ..
15c .. is now most likely 10c
now this isn't retail .. because they all collude (yep every one of your brokerage firms
will loan out your PTOI *shares* if they can get away with it which because of that T + 3 .. they can .. for a PRICE)
but *original + added colluding entities* >> are stuck in a dilemma of their own making
they have 2 choices .. keep reducing PPS on PTOI (which i've shown isn't working)
ATS DATA POST >> dated data but showing an increase re: total lack of traction (ie that volume didn't come from
a legit seller of PTOI .. rather a cert was accessed hoping to create FEAR)
the way it works ..
entity enters an OTC stock .. with 2 crews (most are interchangeable)
one side works what i call the PRO side .. the other side works the CON side
entity front loads then runs OTC stock utilizing PRO side
entity then undertakes the *short* in the OTC stock (CON side)
depending on various aspects (SS legitimacy et al) there may be more than 1 RUN
b4 the final *KILL* for profit order is executed
the problem entity encountered with P2O ran across multiple levels
not the least of which was an *initial* inability to access P2O certs in 2010
that inability set up 4+ years of *efforts* to force out legit sellers of significance
2 years ago .. *entities* line in the sand was 1.50 to 1.65 which i noted *there*
one can observe the rather curious reality of dolt's settlement and the RUN
on PTOI to 1.49
after of course an aromatic sold *mere* days b4 said settlement @ approx 77c
suspect this *aromatic* and others (of the colluding variety) were responsible
for threshold being triggered on PTOI for the second time (June 2012 .. 10 days)
realize within mere days of dolt's settlement RUN .. resetting via compression
of PTOI was back in play (as it had been with that one exception since mid 2012)
fingers point to *collusion* specific to who *entered* P2O in 2012
so if in 2012 and 2013 .. entities' line in the sand was 1.50 to 1.65
what did it become after 18 to 19 months of non stop compression via resets?
my thinking in mid Sept 2014 .. was 35 to 55c (approx) .. it's why in mgmt's shoes
and recognizing *entity* was on their knees .. i would have 8k'd the national co.
by the EO the 3rd Q (9.30.14) >> UPDATE
i would never have allowed this FILTH to *rebreak* 10c on PTOI
since then (2+ months ago) and clearly since *volume* undertaken on 10.9 and 10.10.14
that rivals 1.4.12 and 1.5.12 .. in volume only
it's become quite clear that the *new* short (ie line in their sand) is far lower
than 35 to 55c ..
15c .. is now most likely 10c
now this isn't retail .. because they all collude (yep every one of your brokerage firms
will loan out your PTOI *shares* if they can get away with it which because of that T + 3 .. they can .. for a PRICE)
but *original + added colluding entities* >> are stuck in a dilemma of their own making
they have 2 choices .. keep reducing PPS on PTOI (which i've shown isn't working)
ATS DATA POST >> dated data but showing an increase re: total lack of traction (ie that volume didn't come from
a legit seller of PTOI .. rather a cert was accessed hoping to create FEAR)
(0)
(0)
