Posted On: 11/29/2014 6:22:39 PM
Post# of 43065
Hi 4kids, so glad you are back.
This board appreciates your guidance.
Do you feel the recent exclusion of the 'magic catalyst' in Richard Heddles letter, and the statement of only looking for licensing on processors means either,
1. The 'magic catalyst' is not needed and has never been
2. The 'magic catalyst' is not needed only in the 'flagship' so potential buyers do not need it
3. The 'magic catalyst' was always a complete fabrication
This board appreciates your guidance.
Do you feel the recent exclusion of the 'magic catalyst' in Richard Heddles letter, and the statement of only looking for licensing on processors means either,
1. The 'magic catalyst' is not needed and has never been
2. The 'magic catalyst' is not needed only in the 'flagship' so potential buyers do not need it
3. The 'magic catalyst' was always a complete fabrication
(0)
(0)Scroll down for more posts ▼
