Posted On: 11/29/2014 11:55:08 AM
Post# of 43065
I prefer to converse about the company and it's operations only and leave personal commentary and insults off this board since it is against the rules of this site.
That being said, do you feel the recent exclusion of the 'magic catalyst' in Richard Heddles letter, and the statement of only looking for licensing on processors means either,
1. The 'magic catalyst' is not needed and has never been
2. The 'magic catalyst' is not needed only in the 'flagship' so potential buyers do not need it
3. The 'magic catalyst' was always a complete fabrication
Quote:
http://investorshangout.com/termsandcondition
Quote:
Contributions must not:
- contain any material which is defamatory of any person.
- contain any material which is obscene, offensive, hateful or inflammatory.
That being said, do you feel the recent exclusion of the 'magic catalyst' in Richard Heddles letter, and the statement of only looking for licensing on processors means either,
1. The 'magic catalyst' is not needed and has never been
2. The 'magic catalyst' is not needed only in the 'flagship' so potential buyers do not need it
3. The 'magic catalyst' was always a complete fabrication
(0)
(0)Scroll down for more posts ▼
