You're making the mistake of expecting anything even resembling fair play, ethics or even rationality itself from iHub Admins. They've proven beyond a doubt that they have no concept of those values...nor do they even care. The responses they gave you were based on their usually jibber-jabber line of BS...none of it having anything to do with logic, 'genuine' values or even integrity. They gave Crunch the same load of crap , proclaiming that they (in all their fantasized glory) "are 'not' a democracy". They use this psuedo-tenant to enforce their one-sided rules against our collective retorts against libelous-slander & outright lies , while at the same time defending (& abetting) the posts of demented-corrupt troll's, bent on defaming QMC, with highly suspect intent. Think about it...why would a social-based website , who (theoretically) depends on readership (number of views) to sustain & monetize their business model , cast-aside the credibility of their entire forum merely for the benefit of a few troll's (supposed) right to free speech[?]...with 'freedom of speech' being the premeire hallmark of any 'democracy'....nobody with 1/2 a brain would swallow any of this infantile-hypocritical-contradictory load of BS ! Does-not-compute !! By summarilly deleting any & all contrary posts , in favor of the obnoxious rants of some complete moron , they've proven that 'freedom of speech' is the least of their concerns...& at the same time , they continue to ride that poney. All this BS doesn't even come close to adding-up...unless , they 'do not' base their revenues primarilly on readership (& a few inconsequential low-budget pop-ups). How else could they be generating revenue[?]...enough revenue to validate their complete abandonment of principles, ethics & forsaking their duties in the legit conveyance of factual-credible-accurate information to their legions of unsuspecting readers[?]...I-for-one have a pretty good idea how they do it (both front-end & back-end...& it ain't pretty...not pretty 'at all') !