Sounded too much like The Bloody Espinosa. Every post of late that appears to have negative connotations appeals for the same thing, disclosure of financials.

If, in fact, the company is currently in serious negotiations with a significant partner then nothing should be disclosed to protect all parties involved. It would not accomplish anything of positive value as skeptical critics would use that as a launching pad.

I hope, without any degree of certainty at this point, that negotiations are in progress and that complex contract terms are being ironed out through the legal teams which, for Nanologix, includes a little known firm such as Arnold and Porter (please don't take that seriously).

This cannot be accomplished in a week, two weeks, or within any near term time threshold that will satisfy those wanting instant gratification.

I have stated in previous posts that where we are at now is exactly what I was hoping this company would accomplish and that now is the time I have been patiently for, the fruits of their labors coming to fruition.

I can only wish Nanologix the best as well as all long investors, including myself. Let's hope that any foundation being put down is structurally sound.