and as we've said Geo unfairly singled out the only very narrow issues -out of context- that could be favorable to them in bringing the case in texas in violation of the jva CA jurisdiction- which the judge only allowed because of geos broader contentions re shirley which geo never even pursued in tx case-did not even depose shirley, who was present w bob for an aug 2013 deposition.

CWRN's much much larger case against Geo for millions in actual damages and up to 100's of millions of punitive has been proceeding toward a possible default judgment after an entry of default against Geo dec 2012-

so we wait to hear the CA courts ruling on Geos 2nd pro hac vice -(authorization from the court to approve Geos proposed associate CA counsel) which CA court already rejected once.