Posted On: 10/25/2014 3:23:33 PM
Post# of 43065
oh I suspect that PP is correct and pyrolysis just isn't profitable, I suspect that many of these companies are scams with unscrupulous CEOs.
But with respect to PTOI, I can't believe that investors would wilingly continue to invest in, DCA, or otherwise support a company that lied to them about the investment prospects. 5 years ago this was propsed as a profitable investment, a sure thing. That is why it went to $7. That, plus likely some market manipulation thrown in by a few retail investors,
At this point PTO has said that no further development wil occur. They have their "flagship". Well, it is not profitable, So that is that, I does not get any better than the last financial statements, which I posted on.
Nothing like what was promised in the SAIC study, which I have posted on as fraudulent. That should make an interesting story some day,
So what is going to change to make PTO pyrolysis profitable? Nothing much,,,
But with respect to PTOI, I can't believe that investors would wilingly continue to invest in, DCA, or otherwise support a company that lied to them about the investment prospects. 5 years ago this was propsed as a profitable investment, a sure thing. That is why it went to $7. That, plus likely some market manipulation thrown in by a few retail investors,
At this point PTO has said that no further development wil occur. They have their "flagship". Well, it is not profitable, So that is that, I does not get any better than the last financial statements, which I posted on.
Nothing like what was promised in the SAIC study, which I have posted on as fraudulent. That should make an interesting story some day,
So what is going to change to make PTO pyrolysis profitable? Nothing much,,,
(0)
(0)Scroll down for more posts ▼
