When I was on a conference call with Naumu he sounded like a very scared cat. He claimed he had not benefitted in any way and was still owed the shares he was promised in their agreement, even in restricted form. That was 2 months ago. Imo he has pulled the plug and is gone out of fear of eventual prosecution. If he received nothing for his part I guess he assumes he has no part in the illegal deception. The law may see this differently. A bank robber who is an accessory to the crime that gets stiffed on his cut of the plunder is still guilty of bank robbery, it just makes him a bigger dummy for not getting paid for the crime.