Posted On: 10/17/2014 3:34:21 PM
Post# of 43066
sheesh PP .. seriously
try this on for size ..
a colluding entity worked both angles
that would be >> specific to either outcome >> throw a dart
break the stock >> to force legit sells >> from
emotionally exhausted retail investors .. setting in play
the take down .. which would allow (in due course) a
white .. er >> knight >> to offer those remaining a price
of X for those remaining shares ..
had that succeeded .. odds are *tech* would have been
IPO'd within 2 to 3 years .. again >> competition is healthy
and best of breed/early successful adopter in this emerging
sector will create generational wealth for those who understand
how the game gets played
how ironic that that 2M *share* gamble backfired yet again
i'm reminded of each and every *attempt* since 2010
some are just *slow* >> or as i call it .. grossly stupid coupled
with egregious *greed* does not make for an attractive *combo*
====================
pssst .. here's a clue >> which goes back to 2009/2010
basic DD done by various *colluding entities* would have
revealed something *many* of us actual *investors* already know ..
P2O investors are in because of *initially* >> JB's vision >>
then realizing impact of the disruptive tech >> the total lack of *competition*
that is publicly traded (dolt compliant) and of course the ability for prox to
solve a very real issue pertaining to plastic some of us actually care about
there is something else those who post *negatively* 24/7/365 since 2009
should understand .. we've long (P2O investors) made the choice to ride
this till the end .. there is no in between *here* ..
4kids
try this on for size ..
a colluding entity worked both angles
that would be >> specific to either outcome >> throw a dart
break the stock >> to force legit sells >> from
emotionally exhausted retail investors .. setting in play
the take down .. which would allow (in due course) a
white .. er >> knight >> to offer those remaining a price
of X for those remaining shares ..
had that succeeded .. odds are *tech* would have been
IPO'd within 2 to 3 years .. again >> competition is healthy
and best of breed/early successful adopter in this emerging
sector will create generational wealth for those who understand
how the game gets played
how ironic that that 2M *share* gamble backfired yet again
i'm reminded of each and every *attempt* since 2010
some are just *slow* >> or as i call it .. grossly stupid coupled
with egregious *greed* does not make for an attractive *combo*
====================
pssst .. here's a clue >> which goes back to 2009/2010
basic DD done by various *colluding entities* would have
revealed something *many* of us actual *investors* already know ..
P2O investors are in because of *initially* >> JB's vision >>
then realizing impact of the disruptive tech >> the total lack of *competition*
that is publicly traded (dolt compliant) and of course the ability for prox to
solve a very real issue pertaining to plastic some of us actually care about
there is something else those who post *negatively* 24/7/365 since 2009
should understand .. we've long (P2O investors) made the choice to ride
this till the end .. there is no in between *here* ..
4kids
(0)
(0)
