Concern 1 – I am not sure where you are getting this from but the pre-inspection report has this on different pages. I see this is under G. Inspection Findings 1. Site: and I do not believe the inspectors are adding the square footage of all 3 building. If I recall the office building was something like 16,000, building 2 was 26,000, building 3 was not completed yet and Bill accelerated the build out on building 2 per HC’s request. So the inspection I believe the inspection is just on building 2. I believe building 3 will be grandfathered in as far as code and zoning because the permits were already granted etc. That said, this was some time ago and I have slept a few times since then so if I am off I am sure someone will chime in and correct the numbers.

Concern 2 – Referring to the scaled-down prototype of the growing pod and the HC team was unable to inspect against the division 3 security requirements. This information was under section H of the pre-inspection report and stated

Quote:

---

The Company constructed a scaled-down prototype of the growing pod for the inspection. The prototype was constructed primarily of glass; however there was an area where non-transparent material was used which would cause a blind spot during visual monitoring. The Company was advised that an RPIC or A/RPIC must supervise and be physically present in any area that activities related to medical marijuana are taking place. Also the prototype growing pod did not have in/out access card readers; this would be required as per Regulations regarding areas where cannabis is present. In addition to this, there were no cameras present in the prototype, based on the applicant’s proposed growing model they would need to demonstrate that adequate visual monitoring of the activity in each growing pod could be achieved.

---

Given the size of these pods I think it was wise to build a scaled down version so the inspectors can inspect it and specify the improvement to be made then modify the prints to build the growing pods on a full scale instead of spending the time and effort not to mention the expense in building a grow pod that would not be acceptable to the inspectors. When architects design a building I think they typically build a scaled model and do not dive into construction. Again, the Inspector's Conclusion stated

Quote:

---

the applicant will be ready and able to meet the requirements of the MMPR provided the deficiencies noted furring the inspection debrief meeting are addressed. A re-inspection may be required to assess the security measures for the full scale growing pods once construction is complete.

---

That said, this is just my take and opinion on the subject.

GrOw FITX