So I guess the $ million question is are we actually "adding value" to the product on Site 1??? I think it's as simple as that..... I would like to think that Bill and team have researched this to death and believe they are not adding value thus can grow as much product as permitted by HC... Maybe there is an old legal case that makes this point??? I do not know... If it is deemed that they are adding value, I wonder what the fall back alternative or option is??

I will be so glad when all the drama, questions, and permit(s) get issued. The next few weeks and month will be very interesting.

Any comments or opinions are welcome...