Posted On: 10/01/2014 11:32:26 PM
Post# of 43066
Well, I think Mr. Rauber helped Mr. Bordynuik enormously when he promised shareholders "cash flow positive" by Q1, 2013. Investors trusted Mr. Rauber and the excited debate was whether cash flow positive would happen before Q1 2013 or it would show after the quarter was done. He made investors giddy once again.
After all of Mr. Rauber's statements turned out to be entirely baseless, Mr. Rauber left while telling investors the only reason cash flow positive didn't happen was because processor #3 wasn't up and running. That set the expectation in shareholders' minds that once processor #3 was up, cash flow positive would be imminent. After none of that came to fruition, Mr. Bordynuik was insulated from any information he might have fed Mr. Rauber to disseminate to shareholders. Mr. Rauber was a great pawn.
.
After all of Mr. Rauber's statements turned out to be entirely baseless, Mr. Rauber left while telling investors the only reason cash flow positive didn't happen was because processor #3 wasn't up and running. That set the expectation in shareholders' minds that once processor #3 was up, cash flow positive would be imminent. After none of that came to fruition, Mr. Bordynuik was insulated from any information he might have fed Mr. Rauber to disseminate to shareholders. Mr. Rauber was a great pawn.
.
(0)
(0)
Yes, I understand your penny stock also is the real deal, created with the inventiveness of Edison and destined to be the next Microsoft. Yes, I understand that the delays are also only because your company is making their product and/or technology even more revolutionary.
