I know, it's fascinating stuff - that happened over two years ago. Discussions about whether or not SAIC was fed data from JBII versus being a truly "independent" evaluation has no bearing on what the company is doing now. There is this question: whether or not

Quote:

---

the Company is working very closely with a highly regarded national engineering firm and its clients to complete sales of processors, which such firm is currently qualifying the JBI 'Flagship Processor' for sales to its clients. The Company intends to focus on the technology, develop unique feed systems for customer-specific requirements, and to manufacture the core processor components. In addition to its sales assistance, Company Management anticipates having the engineering firm install, operate and maintain processors as well as provide all auxiliary support systems. This will enable Management to focus on potential customer implementations. The Company has refined its 'Flagship Processor' to commercial ready standards and it is ready for sale.

---

This is where many of us are focusing our attention - not quibbling over something that happened over two years ago, or whether or not the plant is producing fuel, or whether or not the process meets your "simple math" metrics.

No amount of dredging up past events, name calling, or posing irrelevant hypotheticals can obfuscate what the company is now trying to do. Whether or not they succeed is what we are waiting for - thick skulls and all.

Good luck hanging on to the past - may it yield you all the satisfaction you seek.