Quote:

---

And I'll say if everything is tested and ready to go...and the only step left is to put feedstock into the processor and take valuable fuel out of the other end...then four years of 'setbacks' is extremely excessive.

---

Are you asserting that the processor design didn't change significantly over that 4-year span? I believe that it did - and as such, claiming that "everything is tested and ready to go" ignores the nature of evolving tech.

Quote:

---

It's not hard to be honest and transparent with shareholders. When the insiders don't do those simple things, they're trying to keep shareholders uninformed intentionally.

---

Would you agree that full disclosure in a competitive environment (and a nascent industry) might not benefit the company, or its shareholders? I certainly wouldn't expect Apple to send out detailed remarks about its products in development to better inform its competitors.

This is a tiny cap company that is working on technology that could have commercial / industrial value to producers of waste stream plastics. If I had to choose between advancing the tech to a stage where it can be sold, or sending out shareholder updates every time someone complains that they're "in the dark", I'll choose the corporate goal every time - especially when the company has limited finances.

One way or another, this story will end, and some here have placed their bets that they're on the right side of it. At least they have the balls to "have skin in the game".