Posted On: 09/16/2014 12:27:15 AM
Post# of 43065
Re: PaperProphet #13660
I am hard pressed to understand why someone who is not a shareholder would continue to spend time posting rhetorical questions here.
I seem to remember you stating some time ago, when asked why you spend time posting here, that "scam" companies interest you, and you like observing how they invariably fail.....a quick look at your posting history here @ I Hang shows that you have posted on the boards of exactly TWO companies, despite the indisputable fact that there are hundreds, if not thousands, of companies on the Pinks / OTCBB that fit your definition of "scam".....Furthermore - of the two companies you've posted about, the ratio of posts is hardly egalitarian (as of today, 876 to 13 - draw your own conclusions). A rational passer by would conclude that such a posting history demonstrates far more than a trivial interest in "scam" companies.
Most of these questions have already been answered numerous times, the rest may be by the company at some point in the future - but it is clear that you have no interest in the answers given, if they don't support your theory. I had not heard that John is hiding from shareholders - where did you get that information? Or is that yet another example of your "piercing insight"?
It might be a far more interesting (and useful) discussion if you were honest with the board about the reasons why you're really here, and why you continue to spin the same old thread of guesswork and insinuation, punctuated by questions that have already been answered, settled, or irrelevant.
One way or another, this story will end, and some here have placed their bets that they're on the right side of it. At least they have the balls to "have skin in the game".
I seem to remember you stating some time ago, when asked why you spend time posting here, that "scam" companies interest you, and you like observing how they invariably fail.....a quick look at your posting history here @ I Hang shows that you have posted on the boards of exactly TWO companies, despite the indisputable fact that there are hundreds, if not thousands, of companies on the Pinks / OTCBB that fit your definition of "scam".....Furthermore - of the two companies you've posted about, the ratio of posts is hardly egalitarian (as of today, 876 to 13 - draw your own conclusions). A rational passer by would conclude that such a posting history demonstrates far more than a trivial interest in "scam" companies.
Quote:
Is Mr. Bordynuik answering questions now?? Last I heard, he was hiding from shareholders.
Quote:
If any shareholder outside of Mr. Bordynuik's inner circle is actually able to communicate with Mr. Bordynuik, they might ask him about the nature of the feedstock he put into the processor and what exactly came out.
Quote:
Maybe also ask what is currently stopping potential customers from purchasing a processor after a year and a month.
Quote:
Or what, besides the plant being out of commission, is still holding up profitable fuel production?
Quote:
Are the processors once again operational as has been vaguely suggested in press releases or not?
Most of these questions have already been answered numerous times, the rest may be by the company at some point in the future - but it is clear that you have no interest in the answers given, if they don't support your theory. I had not heard that John is hiding from shareholders - where did you get that information? Or is that yet another example of your "piercing insight"?
It might be a far more interesting (and useful) discussion if you were honest with the board about the reasons why you're really here, and why you continue to spin the same old thread of guesswork and insinuation, punctuated by questions that have already been answered, settled, or irrelevant.
One way or another, this story will end, and some here have placed their bets that they're on the right side of it. At least they have the balls to "have skin in the game".
(0)
(0)Scroll down for more posts ▼
