as a previous post of mine says, shorters take advantage of the limited investor pool in a ''no info'' stock,though theres lot of info on website, where only investors w prescient insight into the game changing tech are invested-so shorters can use their games of attrition etc

shorters also pick such stocks so they can incessantly shout no financials

before they report substantial revenue they should upgrade to at least current info pink classification,at which time they will be reporting financials

no matter what the technical def of development co is -until there are substantial revenues to begin offsetting the development costs- esp as development would likely still be continuing- financials would have limited utility - i'm not against such - i have ,inter alia, a full accounting degree summa- but at this stage i would be more interested in other things in a quarterly than financials

for the informed investor PPS does not depend solely on financials at this stage but rather on an investors idea of the discounted future value of the game changing tech

shorters purposefully divert attention from this dynamic to one of their own choosing- their continual attacks against a relatively closed investment pool

NNLX PR'd VP of sales ca April- so might expect to see the fruit of that and the continuing development ca 1yr after PR in a situation such as this? sooner? dont know when-only that its getting closer

shorters fear is the co will announce things their playbook cannot handle-which is why the co needs to be wise to the games played in the market