PP .. zero issues drawing the line in the sand

what continues to elude .. is no 2 buyers of P2O prox will have the same intent re: usage or their requirements

ergo .. one can conclude that price tags and prox capacity may *vary*
by buyers .. at least initially (ie getting initial foot in the door)

zero doubts we have 4 and 5 sold >> and yep SI's gaggle hasn't been missed

note that $495,000 PO and see if it *appears* on the 3rd Q when filed in mid November

not sure why parallel activities seem to confuse *some* on SI

this truly isn't rocket science

as i note to all haters of all aspects pertaining to all P2O positives

(like CFO and co.s founder self funding to limit dilution) and having
crafted a brilliant settlement plan over a year ago for tools' utilized
that benefits all investors

sorry P2O's survival galls

but until there is another *publicly* traded co. for *true* comparisons

P2O is the successful early adopter

i welcome competition >> it's healthy when it it comes to disruptive techs
within emerging sectors

4kids