I think he is likely pointing out that the "shorters" are hammering their strategy to keep the share price depressed. 10,000 short of 11,000 traded is direct evidence of what they are doing. The share price issue isn't "management". It is a group (or a vile individual and relatives) who can't stand the thought of seeing the company succeed. But the tech is rapidly going beyond them and when it is time they will pay and bankruptcy won't protect their assets because of the malicious and criminal aspect of what they are doing. I wonder if they teach these tactics at places like Wharton?