Update: It is not the name of the company that I question. It is the actual link to the connection.

I think if that link was revealed the contents would make everyone laugh about how light weight the connection really is.

The math simply comes down to the cost of the inputs to the process vs the selling price of the output.

If the processor can be made to perform consistently at the rates that were being approached when the iceberg was hit and there is a customer generating waste plastic that would normally go to landfill, but can be converted by the process into fuel, then there is value.

I believe the quality of the fuel produced is better than that produced by competing systems. The cost of running the processor is minimal.

But not being to fix the flagship says to me that there are more serious issues. If there was something worth saving it would have been saved.

All I hear now is that maybe some other company can make it work.

IF they can it will cost existing shareholders dearly.