You don't seem to understand that a new technology company with significant technology and limited financial resources as well as a share price that is easy to manipulate for the wrong reasons is not the same as those other companies you so blithely cite. When NanoLogix reaches that situation I would be among those insisting on greater transparency. Until NanoLogix reaches that point I consider your continual calls for it to act as a fully reporting "mature" company to be questionable. Either you "don't get it" or there is something else going on here because I have heard your "mantra" repeated incessantly on the other boards. When you have nothing else to say than a small company with a great technology is not reporting like IBM I can only question.