TOO BAD ALPINE HAS SHOWN MALICE AND AFTER ALL WAS
THE ONE WHO 'BOTH' BREACHED THE CONTRACT
AND FILED THE LAWSUIT, FOR BREACH!!!

MALICE IS BAD

IF YOU GO AGAINST YOUR ATTORNEYS ADVICE, YOU ARE ACCOUNTABLE

A FED JUDGE IS THE SOLE INVESTIGATOR AND DECIDER IN THIS CASE!!!

ALPINE WILL EVEN NEED PROOF TO CLAIM MISREPRESENTATION
AND COMPLETE IGNORANCE OF VERY POPULAR CONTRACT LAWS!!!!!

THEY STRUCK A DEAL, EPIC/ALPINE WERE THE ONES "PUBLISHING"
THAT FACT, SO IN LEGAL TERMS, THEY WERE "ADMITTING" THEY WERE FULLY ON BOARD WITH THE TERMS!!!!!!!

SO, WATCH OUT EPIC/ALPINE

MORE LIKELY, DISREGARD FOR THE LAW AND BUSINESS ETHICS
WILL BE PROVEN, BY THE JUDGE HIMSELF/HERSELF!!!!

WHY WOULD ANYONE EVEN REPEAT ALPINES DEFENSE ABOUT JEFF??
HE WASNT EVEN A BOARD MEMBER, NOR LEGAL REPRESENTATION.
SO HOW CAN HIS NAME BE ON A CONTRACT?

ITS NOT LEGALLY RELEVANT AGAINST MMTC, BUT IT MIGHT BE AGAINST ALPINE

AS A MATTER OF LAW ANYONE WHO IS CLAIMING TO BE KNOWLEDGABLE ABOUT THE LAW, AND YET GOES AROUND PERPETUATING THE CLAIMS
OF OTHERS AS A CLOAK FOR THEIR OWN MALICE CAN BE SUMMONED.

YOU CANT GO BACK TO CHANGE 'LAW' TO SUIT YOUR NEEDS,
OR MORE LIKELY, "YOUR TRUE INTENT"

WATCH OUT!!!!!!!

ITS MMTC