Posted On: 08/18/2014 4:50:27 PM
Post# of 43066
well i put them in different categories myself
there are always *moles* (trolls in training in early) placed to be utilized as needed
there is totally unsophisticated retail who wants something for nothing
in a time frame of their making (not remotely realistic)
there is *retail* that is loosely connected to the PRO side
there is *retail* that trades .. recognizing the cycles of $ in play
there are investors who didn't grasp significance of multiple levels in play
against P2O and cost of those *efforts* over the last 5 years
and then there are P2O investors who've never lost sight of the goal
i consider myself in the last category .. but i recognize and understand the others
what is the key (and always has been) is the co.s share structure
a float of 66M .. when *entity* is upside down .. creates a problem resulting
in a *partial* >> laddered >> cover of PTOI >> of 20.00 to 40.00
that is *entities* >> dilemma
here's to mgmt's execution and what material event is 8k'd next
4kids
there are always *moles* (trolls in training in early) placed to be utilized as needed
there is totally unsophisticated retail who wants something for nothing
in a time frame of their making (not remotely realistic)
there is *retail* that is loosely connected to the PRO side
there is *retail* that trades .. recognizing the cycles of $ in play
there are investors who didn't grasp significance of multiple levels in play
against P2O and cost of those *efforts* over the last 5 years
and then there are P2O investors who've never lost sight of the goal
i consider myself in the last category .. but i recognize and understand the others
what is the key (and always has been) is the co.s share structure
a float of 66M .. when *entity* is upside down .. creates a problem resulting
in a *partial* >> laddered >> cover of PTOI >> of 20.00 to 40.00
that is *entities* >> dilemma
here's to mgmt's execution and what material event is 8k'd next
4kids
(0)
(0)
