"Why does the company not simply accurately describe the current condition of the processors?"

We have different opinions about the company but I'm in complete agreement with you on that topic. It's not hard for a company to be clear and unambiguous.

Besides the state of the processors, the company is vague about what goes into the processor and what comes out. They seem to want investors to believe that the process is commercially viable but investors are supposed to connect the dots and make assumptions since the language is always so vague and only suggestive.

If the process was really commercially viable, the company should be shouting the results from the rooftops in clear, unambiguous, unmistakable language. It should be reiterated multiple times in case someone missed it the first time. Nobody should have to guess or speculate whether there's value to the processors or not.

.