Posted On: 08/09/2014 7:50:56 AM
Post# of 43066
Re: SaulGoodman #11994
up early this morning *Saul* .. but thank you for proving my point
btw this is exactly what ITAB posted .. (as you well know)
Read More: http://investorshangout.com/post/view?id=1807...z39tU8PvQB
this is what i posted in response
ITAB .. post a link
no investor i interact with ever posted that
but you knew that
however plenty from the CON side .. sure mention it CONsistently
4kids
Read More: http://investorshangout.com/post/view?id=1807...z39tUMARsd
and here is what you scrounged for >> grade on the parsing of post >> F
not the use of the word *problematic* vs >> massive
btw this is exactly what ITAB posted .. (as you well know)
Quote:
But more importantly what happened to the massive cover that was predicted when they changed the name, symbol and CUSIP?
Read More: http://investorshangout.com/post/view?id=1807...z39tU8PvQB
this is what i posted in response
ITAB .. post a link
no investor i interact with ever posted that
but you knew that
however plenty from the CON side .. sure mention it CONsistently
4kids
Read More: http://investorshangout.com/post/view?id=1807...z39tUMARsd
and here is what you scrounged for >> grade on the parsing of post >> F
not the use of the word *problematic* vs >> massive
Quote:
A significant development is the company will change its name and the company will obtain both a new cusip number and a new trading symbol. That may require a full accounting of outstanding shares. If the alleged naked short issue is a valid issue, the accounting could become very " problematic " for those allegedly short the stock.
(0)
(0)
