i suspect it comes down to what is considered honest dissent

no two individuals will ever approach their DD in the same manner

or time frame/time line >> what matters is  a co.s legitimacy >> their

access to capital (which trolls on ihub have conditioned by rote as a negative)

it's anything but .. non toxic capital is required for growth and expansion >> which

is why JB's return to the treasury of X MILLIONS of shares and original funding by

those locals who know him best >> matter >> it's one PRIMARY reason that JBI

has evolved to this level >> another is P2O >> another is founder's *awareness*

of the *rigged* game played out on the OTC

funny how the oft touted A co *promoted* by so many JBI detractors has had

*years* (at least 4) head start on JBI >> with very little to show for it >> when

compared head on to JBI's evolution  .. just one of the reasons I look forward to

them coming public via their IPO  >> because there can be no more *diversions*

true comps can be done and JBI will be the sector's 800 pound gorilla .. without a doubt

and believe me >>  JBI wants *competition* (real or perceived)

just ask cisco >> when juniper >> came on the scene (competition is both healthy

and necessary in this country's  *regulatory* environment)

as always >> best to all JBI investors

===

4kids