Full marks, Commando. We are greatly in your debt as the principal source of current NF information, but as you say it is entirely wrong that things are this way. No doubt you saw the Ihub post saying IR had claimed it would like to provide more information but was inhibited by 'the Street'. What the heck did that mean? I ask you! It is vital that Rauber reports as you suggest with the Q, because there will otherwise be a devastating blow to confidence.

On a less important point in your previous post - I disagree with you for once. It can hardly be described as 'debate' when all sense is discarded. I really don't know why Longs continue to read Ihub or post there. In retaliation for the recent bans I suggest a total boycott and a move here. It may be a mere pinprick for Ihub's profits but there would be some satisfaction gained if the bashers were restricted to talking to each other - provided of course that the monitors here delete the obvious fud. Yesterday on Ihub 'sunspotter' referred again to jbi as a 'high-end scam' and a 'Mafia' operation pumped by information from its soldiers - (guess who they are?). That was permitted. When I suggested that the Court's defamation decision could, and should be extended to other offenders with greater penalty, I was immediately deleted. So I'm done there and hope more actual investors will migrate their news and views to a serious forum. gltal, ex.