that is true. last year's article attacked a startup for their balance sheet their first year of developing their business plan which was suspect and you could see the reporters were doing some dirty work.

yes, this year's article by the same group tells many truths and gets the nerves in a fit when you meditate upon them, but once again, why did they go after and attack for the second time a startup in an industry for which they are there to promote? good will towards a handful of investors they are concerned about? hardly seems likely.

we know that it is standard OTC shorting procedure to pay someone for bad press at a good time. Kramer admits to doing such for companies on the big boards, planting bad press articles to create that kind of negative shareholder sentiment in order for his hedge company to have made millions and down here that kind of behavior is even less likely to be policed.
In my opinion.