Not sure how to read the posters, but I'm seeing more like .81 spec .73 sens from the longitudinal study right? Any thought on how I'm reading it and what those numbers mean in terms of success? Kinda reads like it needs more work, like the story they're telling is, ok the data is good, not as good as we thought, but it got better with V2, so the bridging study ought to suggest we do better with the optimized assay