Posted On: 07/15/2014 9:22:44 AM
Post# of 43066
Re: SaulGoodman #10802
who orchestrated the share price (over mere days) in Dec 2009
from 1.00+ to 7.00+?
anyone else catch CYNK's *orchestration* last week (viral was last
2 days trading) .. like *most* OTC stox .. it was wash traded in between
bookends of 300k+ *volume* for the 3 weeks of carefully controlled *orchestration*
what was stunning was the *sanction* give by the heavy lifters
(because of course their *chat* room indicates what was en route
on 6.17.14)
a post that goes *poof* >> there >> but has been *captured* >> here
one of the trolls (recently) asked me what *imo* JBII's pps should be
imo 1.25 to 1.50 is a reasonable valuation based on P2O's
disruptive and emerging tech >> prox sale price *indicated* 2x over .. $8M-$9M
flagship (3) having successfully tested potential buyers' feedstock
national company working with P2O (indicated via 7.1.14 update)
and co.s total issued and outstanding >> at this level of transition
the fact that the *crew* (both sides) were so grossly stupid coupled
with their egregious greed .. for how many years now? .. isn't
retails' problem
the fact that the *crew* has seemingly made the choice to reset
the clock (52 week low) .. via *mostly* wash trading (resets) via
colluding entities >> isn't retails' problem
each tape of JBII >> *trades* is an electronic fingerprint
it is very clear (*volume*) that all who wanted out >> have departed
which leaves mostly bogus *volume* and the occasional marker
pulled from the *crew* .. to an investor (or trader)
getting interesting .. again
4kids
from 1.00+ to 7.00+?
anyone else catch CYNK's *orchestration* last week (viral was last
2 days trading) .. like *most* OTC stox .. it was wash traded in between
bookends of 300k+ *volume* for the 3 weeks of carefully controlled *orchestration*
what was stunning was the *sanction* give by the heavy lifters
(because of course their *chat* room indicates what was en route
on 6.17.14)
a post that goes *poof* >> there >> but has been *captured* >> here
one of the trolls (recently) asked me what *imo* JBII's pps should be
imo 1.25 to 1.50 is a reasonable valuation based on P2O's
disruptive and emerging tech >> prox sale price *indicated* 2x over .. $8M-$9M
flagship (3) having successfully tested potential buyers' feedstock
national company working with P2O (indicated via 7.1.14 update)
and co.s total issued and outstanding >> at this level of transition
the fact that the *crew* (both sides) were so grossly stupid coupled
with their egregious greed .. for how many years now? .. isn't
retails' problem
the fact that the *crew* has seemingly made the choice to reset
the clock (52 week low) .. via *mostly* wash trading (resets) via
colluding entities >> isn't retails' problem
each tape of JBII >> *trades* is an electronic fingerprint
it is very clear (*volume*) that all who wanted out >> have departed
which leaves mostly bogus *volume* and the occasional marker
pulled from the *crew* .. to an investor (or trader)
getting interesting .. again
4kids
(0)
(0)
