Posted On: 07/08/2014 8:48:51 PM
Post# of 41414
Hey, Benny, if I read Mr. K's post 5263 I think he finally got what we have been saying all along!
What is your take on his statement(s) in that post.
The only thing I would add is that any pps change on weak, anemic volume - whether up or down - really doesn't mean much at all. I think it is a matter of statistics: the more samples you take, the more accurate and reproducible will be the results. In other words, you can't go out on the street and ask one guy what he thinks about President Obama and then make the assumption that 100% of the United States thinks he's an a$$.
(On second thought, maybe that was a poor choice of an example, but I'm sure you get what I mean).
What is your take on his statement(s) in that post.
The only thing I would add is that any pps change on weak, anemic volume - whether up or down - really doesn't mean much at all. I think it is a matter of statistics: the more samples you take, the more accurate and reproducible will be the results. In other words, you can't go out on the street and ask one guy what he thinks about President Obama and then make the assumption that 100% of the United States thinks he's an a$$.
(On second thought, maybe that was a poor choice of an example, but I'm sure you get what I mean).
(0)
(0)
