Posted On: 07/01/2014 10:43:00 PM
Post# of 768
Re: bellsandwhistles #208
bells,
Seems as if you could almost swap companies in these.
#1 would deal with the Crystal Falls debacle.
#2 would describe the consecutive incorrect financials SKTO put out, especially in how they were writing off all of the revenues they claimed in 2013.
#3 again similar to #1.
#4 would describe all the intertwined dealings with the "unnamed note holders" and how they tie in to Hipple/Jan/iEquity.
I've never seen "sister stocks" suspended together.
Wouldn't that say quite a bit about how confident the SEC is in their beliefs about all the players involved?
Thanks for filling me in on the details. I should grab some popcorn and watch that show unfold...it will probably (if it happens before SKTO) give any firm a template. Fill in the blanks.
IMO
Seems as if you could almost swap companies in these.
#1 would deal with the Crystal Falls debacle.
#2 would describe the consecutive incorrect financials SKTO put out, especially in how they were writing off all of the revenues they claimed in 2013.
#3 again similar to #1.
#4 would describe all the intertwined dealings with the "unnamed note holders" and how they tie in to Hipple/Jan/iEquity.
I've never seen "sister stocks" suspended together.
Wouldn't that say quite a bit about how confident the SEC is in their beliefs about all the players involved?
Thanks for filling me in on the details. I should grab some popcorn and watch that show unfold...it will probably (if it happens before SKTO) give any firm a template. Fill in the blanks.
IMO
(0)
(0)
