Posted On: 06/25/2014 11:06:11 AM
Post# of 17653
I'm not "implying" anything. I am clearly stating that Garry McHenry has published unaudited financials reflecting over 2 million in revenues.
Because he has done this he also needs to provide confirmation that these revenues actually exist for potential investors to gain confidence to purchase high volume shares.
Confirmation of existence could come in the form of an audited Annual, publishing of the partners/clients names so they can be confirmed by shareholders/potential invetors, and or McHenry making a public statement/pr clearing up any or all of the above, which McHenry can be held accountible to.
Garry's actions and not my words will answer the question you pose of DUTV's fraudulence or validity.
Because he has done this he also needs to provide confirmation that these revenues actually exist for potential investors to gain confidence to purchase high volume shares.
Confirmation of existence could come in the form of an audited Annual, publishing of the partners/clients names so they can be confirmed by shareholders/potential invetors, and or McHenry making a public statement/pr clearing up any or all of the above, which McHenry can be held accountible to.
Garry's actions and not my words will answer the question you pose of DUTV's fraudulence or validity.
(0)
(0)
