Posted On: 06/21/2014 3:24:07 AM
Post# of 43065
The 4.5 yr. evolution from table top to P3 is clearly outlined and available for anyone who wishes to read about it. Dec. 2013 AGM transcript and Nawtec papers are two good places to start, for example.
Some folks are unable to distinguish between excuses and tech evolution, i.e. overcoming technical hurdles during the scaling process, like front-end pre-melt (then HTF), back-end fuel, burner systems, compressors, towers, and software interface. Too bad Bordynuik wasn't smart enough to see all the tech challenges in advance...lol.
I guess he was supposed to just push the green button in 2010 on P1?
Some industry start-ups burn through 45 million each quarter, while other folks cry foul about 60 million over 4.5 years.
One thing I do know: any sustained buying pressure is to be enormously feared by shorts, MMs, and trolls who work for shorts and MMs. Why else would the barrage of negativity continue?
Some folks are unable to distinguish between excuses and tech evolution, i.e. overcoming technical hurdles during the scaling process, like front-end pre-melt (then HTF), back-end fuel, burner systems, compressors, towers, and software interface. Too bad Bordynuik wasn't smart enough to see all the tech challenges in advance...lol.
I guess he was supposed to just push the green button in 2010 on P1?
Some industry start-ups burn through 45 million each quarter, while other folks cry foul about 60 million over 4.5 years.
One thing I do know: any sustained buying pressure is to be enormously feared by shorts, MMs, and trolls who work for shorts and MMs. Why else would the barrage of negativity continue?
(0)
(0)Scroll down for more posts ▼
