imo .. ALL who wanted out .. *sold* by EO Jan 2014

i guess what i find odd (not sure if that is the correct word)
is why retail doesn't read the filings and do the math

it was very clear to me at least that mgmt was operating on a fiscal
shoestring

just based on their Q filed in Nov 2013 .. and when RH put in monies

that is why burn rate and getting rid of the dead wood carried since
their departures (specific to KR and TB) was what was important
re: K's 12.31.13 date

i also posted that the raising of funds (filed) earlier this year >> most
likely pertained to paying the K's *fee*

i'm beyond stunned how few have noted the *cost* of not going *dark*
and what that cost was the prior year (2012)

there is a cost to the Q as well >> even tho' unlike the K it is not audited

however Q's are always *reviewed*

lastly the cost and replacement of the company's CFO

while timing (sequence isn't as tight as i'd like it to be)

imo that filing on 3.18.14 .. was the beginning of what i expect re: a sequence
of material events filed by mgmt

that can't be *misinterpreted*

glty

4kids