Posted On: 06/07/2014 2:48:09 PM
Post# of 43066
Re: PaperProphet #8965
ah another round 
again with the slant against moi
i will reiterate >> why does my investment in JBI via JBII bother you?
and au contraire re: your list .. not in total but some as i was very clear
about >> contemporaneously
the drill of taking a handful and embellishing to all isn't a new one PP
what i continue to find fascinating is the inability to see that seamless
is never an option re: start ups in transition (and that is without being
a pubco via the predatory OTC)
and even more telling that change wouldn't come about >> based on feedback
(both internal and external) since 2009
it's just not reality let alone realistic particularly with disruptive techs in a sector very much in its ascension
you may know that i had an analyst friend review my investment in JBI
(filings and co.s website) and advice on offer was for the co. to sell prox outright
it's game over with first asset sale .. imo that material event comes to pass in 2014
just me but i don't believe housekeeping efforts are being done for the fun of it
nor do i believe co. filed the K and paid the 285k *reduced* fee for 2013
to *motivate* .. imo *staying dark and undertaking repairs* would be
a *dangling carrot*
suspect being current on filings matters to the BoD i expect to see seated in due course
i can also counter *motivations* with *demotions* that will be undertaken
when imo a sequence of material events are filed by mgmt
again imo there is no investor i interact with .. who's done their DD .. who doesn't
recognize all aspects in play re: P2O
4kids
Quote:
You're constantly looking for motivations from the company and you're constantly getting information which you can construe as positive but which ends up being crap.
again with the slant against moi
i will reiterate >> why does my investment in JBI via JBII bother you?
and au contraire re: your list .. not in total but some as i was very clear
about >> contemporaneously
the drill of taking a handful and embellishing to all isn't a new one PP
what i continue to find fascinating is the inability to see that seamless
is never an option re: start ups in transition (and that is without being
a pubco via the predatory OTC)
and even more telling that change wouldn't come about >> based on feedback
(both internal and external) since 2009
it's just not reality let alone realistic particularly with disruptive techs in a sector very much in its ascension
you may know that i had an analyst friend review my investment in JBI
(filings and co.s website) and advice on offer was for the co. to sell prox outright
it's game over with first asset sale .. imo that material event comes to pass in 2014
just me but i don't believe housekeeping efforts are being done for the fun of it
nor do i believe co. filed the K and paid the 285k *reduced* fee for 2013
to *motivate* .. imo *staying dark and undertaking repairs* would be
a *dangling carrot*
suspect being current on filings matters to the BoD i expect to see seated in due course
i can also counter *motivations* with *demotions* that will be undertaken
when imo a sequence of material events are filed by mgmt
again imo there is no investor i interact with .. who's done their DD .. who doesn't
recognize all aspects in play re: P2O
4kids
(0)
(0)
