The original example given was merely a guide where inherent value is subjective to the underlying conditions of the company. Simple placing the Debt feature comparison make the subjective price basis higher, therefore there can be an indirect corollary. That is the point. Not to engage in exact price prognostication.

So there are a number of cans opened tonight... I, like Ben, am not settled .25. I also hold a solid seven figure amount (under Bens). I too, would like to value the price at a realistic future price point whether it is 1 5 or 24 years out. Naturall, my assumption uses the basis that it will take a few years for this company to reach the maturity of the others, and is proper cash/asset management is used, the debt becomes a factor. Much of the debt used by say a delta was for acquisitions, perhaps that is where Baltia goes, but for organic growth, my assumptions stand.