Question. If the SAIC summary is supposed to be so utterly useless, then why does it have so many panties in a bunch? I mean wow, just wow, some people want heads to roll over it. The level of anger it has stirred from the detractor side of the fence kind of has me convinced that it must be spot on accurate.

All one need do is calculate varying amounts of up time. The number are astounding even with high downtime percentages.

And OMG! Crunch the numbers with 10 processors running and you get light headed.

What about 30? Or 60?

I need a cocktail. Once the SEC case settles and CFP is in the rear view we should have a double digit handle.