Losing a libel case in a Canadian court (as THOSE DEFENDANTS DID) where the judge saw A NEED to mention  RESTRAINTS ON THE ACTIVITIES OF "agents and others working for them" is a pretty good clue for most normally intelligent people!

Albeit NOT ABSOLUTE PROOF, it is good enough for most... MORE AMAZING HOWEVER is that it does not serve as A WARNING for others who have not yet seen the inside of a courtroom!