only about 5% of rulings in general are overturned on appeal- arbitrary and capricious standard

so if geo cant manipulate the trial court judge after all the imo discovery /false accusation games they played to try to get the trial court judge on their side,they will have much less chance to manipulate an appellate judge,where there is much less contact

envision the case between geo and bob et al as a huge pizza with 14 slices

geo separated out of that pizza the only issue/slice on which they apparently thought they had a chance in hell of winning- and then they bizarrely- in violation of the jva venue provisions- took that one issue to TX to disadvantage Bob et al-making tx a one sided affair

TX judge denied Geo's sudden request for arbitration ca summer 2013 on basis jva did not provide for jurisdiction in TX- well same holds true for the judge case-allowing it because of accusations re shirley -which geo has not followed up on- so TX venue is bizarre

once that 1 issue is settled in TX Geos claims are OVER and cannot be litigated again-

then it will be Bob/the old CWRN's chance to bring their potentially much larger 13 counts of action/slices of pizza involving potentially ca 7.5 million actual damages (including that which may inure to stockholders of record at that time- by my guess- and potentially many scores of millions punitive damages

so imo CWRN/Brad will not have the same restraints re communication of info-for there will be nothing geo could do about it-unless its some strange info out of left field not forecast by Bobs CWRN's complaint against Geo- in 13 counts -13 slices of pizza-and I dont foresee that

as far as slices of pizza go u will have to ask kubi- he's the expert on pizza